Clarity and measurability
Finds vague requirements, undefined terms, unmeasurable specifications, ambiguous language, and unclear evidence expectations.
Know whether your RFP is ready to publish.
Tendergate reviews the complete tender package, surfaces unclear or conflicting requirements, and shows quoted evidence for every finding plus a source label when available.
One full quality check included with a new account. No credit card required.
Every finding shows what is wrong, why it matters, and how to fix it.
Open a finding to review the specific issue, an actionable recommendation, and the source evidence behind it. Your team can verify the agent's reasoning before changing the RFP.
A complete publication-readiness review.
The quality check works through every supplied document and annex, then searches across the package for omissions, contradictions, and rules that cannot be applied consistently.
-
-
Completeness
Checks for missing scope, submission instructions, qualification requirements, contractual terms, milestones, and evaluation information bidders need.
-
Cross-document consistency
Compares dates, amounts, terminology, scope, responsibilities, and requirements across the main RFP, forms, and annexes.
-
Fairness and competition
Flags unnecessarily restrictive or discriminatory conditions and requirements that may create unjustified barriers for bidders.
-
Evaluation and scoring
Checks weightings, formulas, score bands, measurable criteria, and whether different evaluators can apply the method consistently.
-
Timelines and process
Reviews response periods, milestones, dependencies, deadline conflicts, clarification rules, submission mechanics, and award procedures.
-
Budget and pricing
Verifies arithmetic, cost breakdowns, commercial assumptions, and whether scope, quantities, contract term, and budget align.
-
Supported legal obligations
Checks applicable publisher duties from mounted jurisdiction rulebooks against their thresholds and conditions, with exact legal-source citations.
Useful findings, not a pass/fail score.
Each finding includes a calibrated severity, a specific explanation, quoted source evidence, and a concrete recommendation. The review records strengths too, so teams can preserve what already works.
Legal observations use Tendergate's supported jurisdiction rulebooks and remain decision support, not legal advice. If no rulebook is available, the legal dimension is explicitly out of coverage.
Three steps, with no procurement setup maze.
-
Upload the RFP package
Add the main RFP, specifications, forms, pricing schedules, contract drafts, and annexes together.
-
Run the quality check
The existing Tendergate review agent reads the package and checks publication readiness with source evidence.
-
Resolve the findings
Prioritize critical and major issues, verify them against quoted evidence and any available source label, and export the review for your team.
Questions before your first check
What should I upload?
Upload the full package you plan to publish: the RFP, technical specification, evaluation methodology, pricing forms, contract draft, and annexes.
Does this replace legal review?
No. Tendergate flags risks using supported jurisdiction rulebooks and source evidence, but it is decision support rather than legal advice.
Can I see where a finding came from?
Yes. Findings include source references and evidence so your team can verify the issue in the uploaded documents.
What happens after the free check?
Your result remains available. To run another quality check, purchase additional Tendergate credits.
Put the RFP through one final gate before publication.
Upload the package, run the review, and give your team a prioritized list of issues with quoted evidence to resolve.
Check my RFP free